Legal names: 12765641 CANADA INC., Arora Comfortechs Ltd., VVDN Technologies Canada Inc., CheckPay Technologies Ltd., Launchtrip Technologies Corp., Xena Technologies Inc., 8418748 Canada Inc.
From the Government of Canada's non-compliant employers list
The employer didn't give the inspector the documents they asked for.
Provision 209.4(1)(b)
The employer was not actively engaged in the business that the foreign national was hired to work for (aside from live-in caregivers).
Provision 209.2(1)(a)(i) or 209.3(1)(a)(i)
The employer didn't give the inspector the documents they asked for.
Provision 209.4(1)(b)
The employer was not actively engaged in the business that the foreign national was hired to work for (aside from live-in caregivers).
Provision 209.2(1)(a)(i) or 209.3(1)(a)(i)
The employer didn't give the inspector the documents they asked for.
Provision 209.4(1)(b)
The employer didn't give the inspector the documents they asked for.
Provision 209.4(1)(b)
The pay or working conditions didn't match, or were not better than, what was listed on the offer of employment, or the job was not the same as what was listed on the offer of employment.
Provision 209.2(1)(a)(iii) or 209.3(1)(a)(iv)
The employer was not actively engaged in the business that the foreign national was hired to work for (aside from live-in caregivers).
Provision 209.2(1)(a)(i) or 209.3(1)(a)(i)
The employer didn't give the inspector the documents they asked for.
Provision 209.4(1)(b)
The employer couldn’t show that the information they listed in the offer of employment was true, for a period of 6 years, starting on the first day the foreign national worked for them.
Provision 209.2(1)(b)(i)
The employer didn’t keep documents that showed they met the conditions of employing a foreign national, for a period of 6 years, starting on the first day the foreign national worked for them.
Provision 209.2(1)(b)(ii) or 209.3(1)(c)(ii)
The pay or working conditions didn't match, or were not better than, what was listed on the offer of employment, or the job was not the same as what was listed on the offer of employment.
Provision 209.2(1)(a)(iii) or 209.3(1)(a)(iv)
4,389 positive LMIAs for 8,476 positions, 2014–2026
314 positions across 256 applications, 2014–2026
This data includes LMIA applications that were denied, refused, or withdrawn. A denial does not necessarily indicate wrongdoing - there are many valid reasons why an LMIA application may not be approved.
Current Job Bank postings linked to an LMIA, pending or approved
+9 more job postings