Kulwinder Sandhu, Daljinder Sandhu and Inderdeep Sandhu

Non-compliant · Eligible again13289 98A Avenue, Surrey, BCAlso at Abbotsford, Mississauga, Windsor, Sherwood Park, Richmond, Woodbridge, Ottawa, Calgary, Crossfield, Wynyard, Battleford, Toronto, Sherrington, North York, Vaughan, Fort St. John, Delta, Thornhill, West Saint Paul, Edmonton, Saskatoon, Concord, Longlac, Windermere, Winnipeg, Fredericton, Port Hope, Salford, Etobicoke, Napierville, Summerland, Langley, Timmins, Carp, Monkton, Goderich, Sperling, Niagara Falls, Maple Ridge, Milton, Richmond Hill, Burnaby, Detla, East York, Vancouver, Brampton, Amherstburg, Hope, Harrow, St.Thomas, Sudbury, Cambridge, Oakville, Tottenham, North Vancouver, Two Hills, Petrolia, Chilliwack, Richibucto, Montreal, Canmore, Burlington, Lloydminster, Turner Valley, Lethbridge, Dundas, Grande Prairie, Scarborough, Kola, London, Sunnyside, York, Port Severn, Morinville, Oldcastle, Wabush, Red Deer, Chatham, Port Coquitlam, Rivière-du-Loup, Fort, Victoria, Aurora, Stoney Creek, Langley City, Nanaimo, Pitt Meadows, Huntsville, St. Catherines, Prince George, Elrose, Red Deer County, Kelowna, Gaspé, Saint-Patrice-De-Sherrington, Thorold, Lakefield, Oliver, Cocord, Greenwood, Osoyoos, Montréal, Niagara-, Ville Saint-Laurent, Elmira, Halifax, Thunder Bay, Kanata, 9500, West Kelowna, Aldergrove, High Level, Fernie, Ayr, Moncton, Windsor-Maidstone and Drayton Valley

Legal names: Balwinder Brar, Amandeep Brar, Datawind Inc., HarnekSingh Seikhon-Jaswinder Kaur Seikhon, Cimpress Windsor Corporation

Fines$29,2505 violations on record
Approved positions5,216710 positive LMIAs, 2014–2026
Denied positions165100 negative LMIAs, 2014–2026
Active postings32Open Job Bank postings

Non-compliance

From the Government of Canada's non-compliant employers list

Final decision
Oct 30, 2026
Penalty
$13,000
Status
Eligible again
Address
13289 98A Avenue, Surrey, BC, V3T 5G2

What the government found

  • Code 9

    The pay or working conditions didn't match, or were not better than, what was listed on the offer of employment, or the job was not the same as what was listed on the offer of employment.

    Provision 209.2(1)(a)(iii) or 209.3(1)(a)(iv)

  • Code 30

    The employer didn’t obtain, and pay for, private health insurance that covers emergency medical care when the foreign national was not covered by provincial health insurance.

    Provision 209.3(1)(a)(xiii)

Final decision
Oct 1, 2021
Penalty
$750
Status
Ineligible · unpaid penalty
Address
18-31501 Upper Maclure Road, Abbotsford, BC

What the government found

  • Code 6

    The employer didn't give the inspector the documents they asked for.

    Provision 209.4(1)(b)

Final decision
Aug 5, 2021
Penalty
$12,750
Status
Ineligible · unpaid penalty
Address
7895 Tranmere Drive, Suite 207, Mississauga, ON

What the government found

  • Code 6

    The employer didn't give the inspector the documents they asked for.

    Provision 209.4(1)(b)

  • Code 9

    The pay or working conditions didn't match, or were not better than, what was listed on the offer of employment, or the job was not the same as what was listed on the offer of employment.

    Provision 209.2(1)(a)(iii) or 209.3(1)(a)(iv)

Final decision
Aug 5, 2021
Penalty
$1,750
Status
Eligible again
Address
123 Short Road, Abbotsford, BC

What the government found

  • Code 2

    The employer didn’t keep documents that showed they met the conditions of employing a foreign national, for a period of 6 years, starting on the first day the foreign national worked for them.

    Provision 209.2(1)(b)(ii) or 209.3(1)(c)(ii)

  • Code 4

    The employer couldn’t show that the description they gave for the job on the Labour Market Impact Assessment application was true, for a period of 6 years, starting on the first day the foreign national worked for them.

    Provision 209.3(1)(c)(i)

Final decision
Aug 15, 2017
Penalty
$1,000
Status
Eligible again
Address
447 Advance Boulevard, Windsor, ON

What the government found

  • Code 9

    The pay or working conditions didn't match, or were not better than, what was listed on the offer of employment, or the job was not the same as what was listed on the offer of employment.

    Provision 209.2(1)(a)(iii) or 209.3(1)(a)(iv)

Approved LMIA history

710 positive LMIAs for 5,216 positions, 2014–2026

By year

Positions
2026
39 LMIAs164
2025
137 LMIAs450
2024
194 LMIAs600
2023
175 LMIAs755
2022
153 LMIAs853
2021
12 LMIAs191
2020
0 LMIAs265
2019
0 LMIAs476
2018
0 LMIAs433
2017
0 LMIAs282
2016
0 LMIAs299
2015
0 LMIAs330
2014
0 LMIAs118

Top occupations

Positions
8431General farm workers1,719
85101Harvesting labourers563
8432Nursery and greenhouse workers519
9615Labourers in rubber and plastic products manufacturing110
7292Glaziers106
9619Other labourers in processing, manufacturing and utilities81

Denied and withdrawn LMIAs

165 positions across 100 applications, 2014–2026

20266 applications7 positions
202520 applications33 positions
20249 applications9 positions
20233 applications4 positions
20221 application1 position
20216 applications8 positions
20206 applications12 positions
201910 applications17 positions
20186 applications9 positions
20178 applications20 positions
20168 applications8 positions
201511 applications15 positions
20146 applications22 positions

This data includes LMIA applications that were denied, refused, or withdrawn. A denial does not necessarily indicate wrongdoing - there are many valid reasons why an LMIA application may not be approved.

Active job postings

Current Job Bank postings linked to an LMIA, pending or approved